Skip to content

PeerfordResearch intelligence

Countries
Institutions
Researchers
Fields
Rankings
Compare
Commons

Search institutions, scholars, countries and publications

Countries
Institutions
Researchers
Fields
Rankings
Compare

CommonsWhere researchers talk about their work

Search institutions, scholars, countries and publications

Every figure here is counted by Peerford from the works themselves, the same way for every institution.

Browse

Countries
Institutions
Researchers
Fields
Rankings
Commons, for researchers

About

How Peerford counts
Compare institutions
Privacy
Terms of use

Contact

hello@peerford.com
https://wa.me/peerford · WhatsApp

Language

English
FrançaisFrench
PortuguêsPortuguese
العربيةArabic

Theme

SystemLightDark

Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems · Peerford

Article · Journal · 2019

Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems

D. Gough, J. Thomas, Sandy Oliver

Systematic Reviews

Open access · Gold
World top 10%
International · 2 countries

Read it 10.1186/s13643-019-1089-2

Citations: 116from other works
Field-weighted impact: 9.431.00 is the world average for its field and year
Among its field: Top 10%by citations, against works of its field and year
Authors: 3from 2 institutions

Authors

3 authors across 2 institutions in 2 countries

D. GoughFirst authorCorresponding
as printed: David Gough
J. Thomas
as printed: James Thomas
Sandy OliverSenior author
- University of Johannesburg (ZA)

Development goals

15Life on land

Funded by

Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research
Department for International Development
Department of Health and Social Care
Economic and Social Research Council
World Health Organization

Countries on it

United Kingdom
South Africa

Also on it

University College Londoneducation · GB

Fields

A work can sit in several, each with a score

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsTopic
Delphi Technique in ResearchTopic
Evaluation and Performance AssessmentTopic